As you have described it, the review process does not seem to be a parliamentary review, but rather a technical review by experts. It appears that what's going to emerge will be another version of this.
Does that process qualify as the parliamentary process that we're satisfied with, or is this some technical review that's attempting to...I don't mean paper over, but to reach some kind of acceptable version that will pass muster? Is it going to be debated openly within Afghanistan in the Parliament, or is it a political fix?