Thank you.
I will answer the first part and let Mr. Wallace talk to you about the GSO, the Governance Support Office, which replaced the SAT.
I would like to begin by saying that we are not boasting here about our accomplishments. The rights of Afghan women and citizens are extremely important. The work that we have undertaken is based on our willingness to help Afghans rebuild and acquire the capability to ensure a better future for their country.
We must also keep in mind that Afghanistan has been in a state of conflict for at least the last 30 years, so it is not just a question of repairing what's there but of having to start again from next to nothing. I agree, the legislation contains elements that are completely reprehensible. However, let us not forget that other laws have led to positive changes in Afghanistan.
I would compare the situation to a child who is learning to walk. He will fall down from time to time and probably get hurt, perhaps even break something. Should we admonish or punish him for that? The normal reaction would be to say to him that we will help him in order to avoid another similar mishap and to ensure that he acquires the skills he needs to walk. I do not think there is some kind of a conspiracy or deliberate attempt to mislead anyone.
President Karzaï has admitted publicly that he had not read the bill and had not received adequate information. He has admitted his mistake, and I do not think that we could ask more of him at this time.
In terms of delays, Afghans have said that a process was in place. A group has begun to review the process. How long does it take in our own legislatures to achieve results through such a process? We are talking about Afghanistan, and it will take some time. When all is said and done, I think that the Afghans will deliver the goods.
I will let Mr. Wallace talk to you about the GSO.