It could fit easily under both categories, because our troops who are there are going to be there as trainers teaching technical skills and also--I would assume, within the military setting--military management skills and strategic skills. There is no reason that these very skilled trainers—if they are very skilled trainers, which I'd assume them to be—couldn't be delivering the program and the methodology we've developed, and the same would apply for our RCMP people who've been there, especially in a capacity as mentors, both at NDS and at the ANP.
At the same time, if you call what we do as a stand-alone organization “civilian”, then it could certainly proceed in that respect as well, particularly in the development of an Afghan train-the-trainers program. But it could switch back and forth between the two.