They would, indeed, all apply.
We weren't taking the position or challenging the Canadian Forces' right to capture and detain individuals in Afghanistan. According to the UN Security Council resolution approving ISAF and also the memorandum of understanding, the technical arrangements between Afghanistan and Canada, it was clear they had the legal authority to capture and detain. So we weren't taking issue with that.
“Unreasonable search or seizure” would be when you capture them and you search them, is there any breach there? We didn't have any evidence alleging that. In terms of arbitrary detention, if you are holding individuals for several months without charge, I think it could be an issue, but we had no evidence of that.
Our concern with respect to section 7 is that they were transferring individuals without any right of hearing. And the Supreme Court of Canada has held, with respect to non-Canadians who are either extradited or deported, that they have the protection of the charter if they're going to be sent to torture. And that's what we were relying on.