Yes, to my knowledge as well.
I have an affidavit from a court case in the U.K., from someone who had a similar job to yours. The affidavit is quite revealing. It says a lot of the things that you're saying. It in fact says that the NDS does not appear to be of any ministry, nor does it appear to have to be overseen by any constitutional body. I'd suggest that it is not accountable to anyone, save the president. However, even this has been disputed.
There's further testimony going back to Amnesty International conclusions and Human Rights Watch that all say the same thing, that the NDS is implicated in torture, in human rights abuse. These reports were not state secrets. In fact, what this person who worked for the U.K. government and was in the region is saying is that in light of that, there's no way to work with the NDS; they can't be reformed. In other words, we should stop transferring detainees to NDS facilities.
Would you agree with that assessment that we should stop transferring detainees to the NDS facilities in light of the reports, that Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and many other institutions have stated that they just can't be trusted?