We're hearing conflicting views. Some DFAIT officials say allegations of abuse were widely known, and they told all members of the government, including your government, about that. Others say they weren't. Others say they don't think that there has been any abuse or that there's any evidence of abuse. There seems to be a difference of opinion based on different views of policies that might have applied or should apply in this circumstance.
How do you see these differing interpretations? How do you put that in context for us? What should we take from that?