We talked about the strength of agreements. You had an agreement in 2005, and there was a supplementary agreement arrangement in 2007.
You know, agreements are fine, but it's the people who are administering them. An agreement can be perfect, but if you have imperfect people applying the agreement, you might get an imperfect result.
Is it fair to say that in a country like Afghanistan, working with some pretty imperfect institutions and people in the context of what we would expect, we're going to see some stumbling on their part?