I certainly wasn't party to those. I was advised that discussions had been held, but you'll recall that we had the PRT, which was fully occupied in dealing with its issues. We had the number of troops who were on a combat mission.
Certainly, from the defence department's point of view, at that point the department was very stretched in the number of soldiers we were sending to Afghanistan and what they were doing. There was definitely a strong opinion at the leadership level that to have diverted troops to the process of managing prisoners would have impinged on their ability to conduct the combat mission.
This was not a matter that was just our problem. The British were discussing the same thing; the Dutch, the Danish, everybody came to the same conclusion. There was an unsuccessful attempt to suggest that perhaps NATO would have been a logical possibility for providing one of the countries in NATO to provide a detainee supervision brigade, or something of that nature, but NATO wasn't willing to pick up that challenge, so that didn't go anywhere.