With respect to your second point about a poll, I'm not familiar with the specifics of the poll. I'm not aware of exactly what the questions were, how they were asked, or what the exact results were. But you've indicated that the Canadian public supports supply management and believes the Canadian government should support supply management.
What I will say generally is that I don't think I'm being inconsistent with that position. I don't think I'm being inconsistent with what obviously the Canadian public must have said in that poll. What I have indicated is that the interests of our members as exporters must be remembered too.
It isn't a win-lose or zero sum game; it is about taking our best position and going forward, from Canada's perspective. Unfortunately, we have no allies. We have no room at the WTO to be so intransigent on that one position with respect to sensitive products.
As I said earlier, supply management is not being negotiated at the WTO; market access is, and the way we treat sensitive products is. That doesn't mean supply management is gone; it just means that Canada has to make some adjustments.
As a grains and oilseeds producer, I''m probably going to have to make adjustments as well, once we get a WTO deal. I am willing to make those adjustments, because I believe many opportunities will also come that will impact me, so I'm willing to make the adjustments.
To say that Canada is the only one making concessions at the WTO simply is not the case. We have many other protectionist countries at the WTO that are willing to make concessions and willing to make adjustments. Even the G-10, which are 10 of the most protectionist countries in the world, recognize that they're going to have to make adjustments within their own systems.