You indicated that Canada is a fair player and that we should be satisfied with that and shouldn't be looking at more access. I guess I have a couple of points on that.
The reality is that all of the countries, unfortunately, could be considered fair players, because they are all playing by the rules. All the countries basically are playing by the access rules that have been outlined in past agreements. In fact, I could give you some examples of where Canada actually hasn't fulfilled its commitments in a couple of products. We could get into that, but it's a bit of a mug's game.
Basically everyone is playing by the rules. So what we need to do is to ensure that the rules are better, that we get a better deal, and that overall we get the deal that we said we were going to get as part of the Doha Round, which was to bring down subsidies, bring down trade distortions, and to improve market access for all products.
I think you spoke to the 5% question, and I will just say quickly that the idea of limiting access to 5% has not gained any support internationally. It's not part of the current negotiations, nor has it been mentioned in the market access papers that the chair has recently put out. With most of the markets that are important to Canada, both where there are tariff rate quotas or where there are high simple tariffs, we already import more than 5% of the domestic consumption. So a simple 5% limit across the board would actually have very little positive impact on Canada's exporters. Though 5% sounds like a good basic starting point, it really would do very little for Canada, and it's actually not even part of the negotiation process right now, anyway.