Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
To answer Mr. Thibault, who was asking a bit earlier whether we could win on both scores, I would say that the House of Commons already gave a unanimous answer on November 22, 2005. That was when the Bloc Québécois tabled a motion to protect supply management while allowing for increased market access. Ms. Koch claims that this motion did great harm to our WTO negotiations, but the unanimous opinion of the Parliament of Canada is that we can defend supply management and increase market access. Ms. Koch, by saying that, you have insulted not only Canadian parliamentarians, but also the elected officials of the National Assembly of Quebec and other provinces—New Brunswick and Ontario, I believe—who have also passed unanimous motions. I do not think that all parliamentarians are off the mark in mentioning that we could at least negotiate to try to win on all scores. That is what any good negotiator should do.
We have heard your opinion on this, Ms. Koch. I find it puzzling because the opinions that I have heard from farmers in Quebec were to the contrary, that this motion had probably saved a good part of our agriculture. I would like to know Mr. Lefebvre's opinion on this. The motion is still there and still very helpful.