I actually do not agree with the notion that the railroads are receiving too much money for maintenance. I think the debate here has been constructed to achieve the goal that I described earlier of offsetting the lease payments. The reality is that we are trying to reconstruct a cost that existed in 1992. The government has moved away from that. Maintenance is about 5% of what we do in the overall activities to move grain to destinations.
To try to reconstruct the cost of 15 years ago and to compare that with a one-year spot check on the maintenance costs in years that have different volumes and different characteristics in terms of the movement of grain basically allows people to throw out numbers that can be highly misleading. I do not believe there is an excess cost, and if there is, it's a very small amount and is not relevant to the overall debate, because the government has moved away from that. They have said we are going to give railroads an overall revenue cap that is fair and 35% lower than is paid by the farmers in the U.S., and that's what we've decided.