I'd like to spend some time talking about market power. The long and the short of it is that they have market power inside Canada, because they have a monopoly inside Canada, but outside of Canada they don't. The monopoly power outside of Canada is certainly challengeable and can be debated.
Part of the issue of the difference in benefits out there—the $500 or $600 that we're hearing now as a benefit, versus the costs Morris showed or the costs we showed—is a question of apples and oranges.
First of all, there's the problem with economists. If you laid them end to end, they couldn't reach a conclusion--and if you laid them end to end, it would probably be a good thing. But economists have different analytic techniques, and when they sit down in a room like this and thrash out their differences, they probably could start reaching conclusions. However, when it gets into propaganda machines or the media, where everything is treated rather superficially and to somebody's benefit, the logic, the analysis, and the results get distorted.
Briefly, one of the biggest differences at the time was and probably still is in the results of the KFT—the Kraft, Furtan, and Tyrchniewicz—study and the Carter and Loyns study. They were done back to back. They were apples and oranges: KFT did analysis of benefits only at the port; we did analysis of costs at the farm level. There's a disconnect.
The reason I'm suggesting you read George Morris is that they go through all of these and pull this together at the end—including ours, using our model, but using other peoples' results as well—and reach their own conclusions. That's the only definitive, comprehensive, one-methodology study that exists out there, plus it's a good literature review.