The least well understood part of this is pooling, and it is not grade pooling. In other words, we don't take all the No. 1 Canada western red spring 13.5, put it in a bank account, average it out, and divide it by tonnes at the end of the day. What they do is an average of spreads. In other words, how does one grade sell compared to No. 1 Canada western red spring 13.5? And that shifts values within the system. So at the end of the day, at the end of the year, the producer has...it's a real disconnect.
On a year in, year out basis, it's not hard to find situations where the board did not perform as well. I don't think it's because the people at the board are doing a bad job, don't get me wrong. I think the structure is wrong. The structure is failing to produce the kinds of returns that are reflective of a futures market in a mutual fund type of averaging system, which the pool could be. So year in and year out, depending on where you are on the prairies, yes, there have been problems with the board.