Oh, you're talking about some of the changes that have taken place. First of all, I talked about the change in the government structure. At one time it was controlled by some commissioners who were appointed by the government and they really had the final say. That was changed probably ten years ago, or something like that. To elected farmers, the board of directors of the Canadian Wheat Board--there are five appointed directors and ten who are elected by the producers of western Canada--are now the governing body of the Canadian Wheat Board. That is a pretty significant change, I think, in terms of who controls the Wheat Board and a farmer's ability to influence the actions of the Wheat Board.
The other point I made was that there have been changes in the way it operates since those changes were made in the governance structure. For instance, I think one of the other speakers talked about the fixed price option; there are early payment options; there's a number of basis contracts. There is a number of those kinds of changes that have been made.
I also want to say that when you come to electing farmer directors for the Wheat Board.... I consulted a number of my colleagues, and these people are all farmers who farm between 3,000 to 5,000 to 10,000 acres. The farmers who support the Wheat Board are not all half-section farmers back on the farm somewhere. This is widely held, because farmers are business people and they make serious decisions about what they want.
Now that we have the opportunity to elect directors, this gives us the opportunity to influence the change. If the board of directors gets to the point at which they think there needs to be another change, at whatever level, then let them do it.