I just think it's completely inappropriate. We have a recommendation here that the minister act in a way that is contrary to an act of Parliament, so I don't see how the committee can recommend that, especially the second item. It is contrary to what the act says clearly. Mr. Easter should know that, and he's recommending that we do that in spite of what the act says. The question's there. He can put what he wants down there. The minister is given the responsibility to lay those out. But the second one is contrary to the Canadian Wheat Board Act and who is allowed to vote in those elections.
On November 9th, 2006. See this statement in context.