In the setting up of the new cancer agency, at its inception will you have an ongoing relationship with them in terms of population health and in terms of the primary prevention that I think we all want? Because individual by individual, I guess, I've never been able to see that we can prove...you know, things that are not proven to be dangerous aren't necessarily safe. So this is a different standard.
From chimney sweeps and testicular cancer to the aniline dye industry and bladder cancer to asbestos and mesothelioma, what capacity do you have to make those links in terms of human health and the things you're approving?