You asked quite a few there, Mr. Easter.
I'm just checking with officials here. I don't believe we have an analysis of how many will not qualify. We do have an estimate of how many will take it up. It's a bit of guesswork, of course, because we're not sure. Farmers don't have to take it up, so it's a bit of a guess. We are estimating that it will put another $500 million into the system, and so that's the analysis that has been done, but I don't have a number as to how many won't do it.
Just on several fronts--one is on low family farm income. That is part of the $1.5 billion. Details of it haven't been announced yet, either because it hasn't gone through the approval process or because it hasn't been completed yet. I announced the general parameters of it. It's an attempt to catch those who have fallen through the cracks, have low family farm income for whatever reasons. It could have been that they've had a couple of drought years in succession on the prairies, or grasshoppers, or they could have been diseased out, or who knows what. This will catch a good number of farmers. Again, I can't announce the details of it, but it is part of the $500 million.
As you mentioned, the $100,000 maximum interest-free loan and the $400,000 maximum available under ESCAP are not completely without strings for farmers; they have to pay them back, but they do allow them not only the increased dollar amount, but also an increased period to market their products. The combination should be good for farmers. It gives them until September 2007 to market, and so it's not as if they have to plant their product, sell it this fall, take whatever price is there, and pay them back. They'll have 16 months to market. That should allow them, in that 16 months, to hope they have that money interest free, and they give them the maximum opportunity to market at the best price during that 16-month period. So it's hoped that will be beneficial to farmers as well.
Maybe I'll go back for another question.