That is the way we need to go, 100%, because when there is a localized problem, like the drought in 2002—that really impacted Saskatchewan, and basically it bankrupted crop insurance. If you could spread that risk out—Some 40% or 50% of the arable crop land is in Saskatchewan, and that really hurt things. There wasn't a good program to begin with, and it's been pared down ever since.
My contention is always that I don't feel there is a price problem in agriculture because I can control price. I can do futures, I can do whatever I need. I can always try to extract a higher, better price, but the weather? There is nothing I can do to control weather.
Let's say General Motors is making cars and all of a sudden it hailed and 50% of their cars got destroyed. That just doesn't happen.