I'm not sure I've heard anyone specifically say that on the production side—The model that was put forward had the option for a corn producer—for example, he could choose a premium at the $3 level, at the $3.50 level, at the $4 level. Canola would be different. It could be $7, $8, $9, or whatever; I'm not here to determine the dollars. I mean, it's hard to make money in insurance. They're there to cover your losses.
You're going to buy the premium that you feel best suits your needs. I think that's putting the onus back on the farmer. You know it's bankable. You can go to the bank with that commitment. You'll get the money and you can borrow on that. So this is a bankable program--all the way through. I'm wondering why more people haven't come forward to say that this is where they want to go. That would take care of some of the costs of trade disorders, where the price is higher. You're covering your costs.
We can't anticipate what the prices might be. We're not going to bring you up to a level that might be much higher than Canadian levels, because the Americans have a bigger treasury than we do. That's not what this is all about. I think you need to take some responsibility, as farmers, where you want to see yourself at the end of the year.