Let me segregate that into two parts. There are the imports of finished products coming in from the States, mostly, at this point. They're coming in as finished non-ICL products. There's also a large base of Canadian manufacturers of non-ICL products.
Because these Canadian manufacturers conform to a 13% rule, which is a ludicrous part of the aspect of this argument, they're entitled to receive special supplementary imports to manufacture those products, regardless of how much competition exists. They may have no competition in the Canadian marketplace for that product, but they're still entitled to the special supplementaries based on a 13% rule. So that's the nuance we have.
In order to supply those manufacturers with special supplementaries, we have to increase our commitment. Our commitment to the TRQ has gone beyond 7.5% up to 8.4%. I think Preston Manning used to say “the root cause”--the root cause of the problem here is the 13% rule. In order to solve this problem, we have to address the 13% rule.