It's not having a lot of direct impact. On the wheat board issue our position has been consistent for many years. We've said that these are issues that should be settled domestically, not internationally by the WTO, and we've been working very closely with Australia, New Zealand, and some others on that position with respect to monopoly powers for state trading enterprises.
That issue, I think, is fairly self-contained, and that question won't be resolved until late in the negotiations. Obviously those will be political decisions once they're made.
On supply management we have been taking a much harder line than others, but I think we've certainly been one of the key players in that negotiation, as in all the rest of the negotiations. In fact, we have been leading much of the technical work around sensitive products and have been working very closely with the U.S. and the European Union and others.
So I don't think it has really constrained us. It will get increasingly difficult as we get to increasingly difficult stages of the negotiations, which is where we're now arriving.