I certainly won't comment on why the bill is here or whether it ought to be here, and I apologize if that was the way my comments were interpreted. I was simply asking the committee to remember that the amendments that are before you are amending a statute that has, as its particular purpose, the protection of environment and health.
The committee may be perfectly suited to look at those amendments. I'm simply saying you need to look at them and interpret them in the context of the statute that is being amended in the first place.