Mr. Bellavance, I do agree with you, without question.
My comment was that we are not in the business of public safety per se. We have a shared responsibility in complying with the regulations because we helped write them, so we're aware of some of the most common sense ways to protect the public. We impart those recommendations to government, hopefully we agree on a way to proceed, and then away we go. Unfortunately, the cost of those recommendations can be prohibitive.
Under no circumstances are we shirking our responsibility in terms of compliance with public safety, but I'd like to say that I think the government has a responsibility for public safety as well. Here's a situation in which the industry will bear 100% of the cost of those security upgrades, while 0% will come from government, other than maybe a few tax rebates. That, to me, is imbalanced. The government should share in the cost of security for the public; they clearly are not.