Thank you.
Mr. Chair, one of my responsibilities as the chief commissioner is to communicate to stakeholders. The purpose of the op-ed piece was to communicate, not to parliamentarians--although we're happy that they read the piece--but to producers in a way that would assure them that grain quality assurance could be maintained under the bill and that the Canada Grain Act would place the interest of producers as a primary importance. That was the purpose of the communication, and in my opinion the communication accomplished what it set out to achieve. I fulfilled my role as a communicator in that regard.
Other than that, I can repeat myself, but I think that's about the only new perspective I can bring to the member's question.