The motion is just saying they disagree with the appointment. It doesn't have a reason why.
Do we have to stipulate the reason it's in there? It does stipulate on page 877 that we have to report back and we have to give our judgment as to whether the candidate has the qualifications and competence to perform their duties. You have to be more specific.
In the past, when Mr. Johnson was appointed to the Wheat Board as a director, we brought forward.... When we reported back that we didn't agree with the appointment, the committee said that they'd failed to demonstrate that they have the qualifications necessary to fulfill the requirements.
So it has to be a lot more specific. I think I'm going to have to agree with Mr. Storseth that this motion is out of order.
I believe that if you guys want to....