Yes, generally we would not have a problem, again, as long as it is quite clear. I understand there have been some other possible terms thrown out for use. No matter what conclusion is come to, those terms have to be clear. They have to be well defined. What they actually mean has to be able to be understood by consumers.
Certainly if the “Product of Canada” designation continues to be used, then that would suggest to consumers that the product itself was grown or raised in Canada, independent of any value-added that may have come after the fact.