The question goes not only to the guidance, but also to compliance with that guidance.
In terms of the CFIA's compliance responsibilities, which cut across—as you're well aware in this committee—animal health, plant health, and human health issues, we prioritize the application of our resources on the basis of all of those interests. As you can imagine, our human health responsibilities come first. However, as they relate to the issue of compliance with the existing guidance, we do investigate “Made in Canada” and “Product of Canada” claims issues on a case-by-case basis. That assessment would generally focus on the value of expenditures directly related to the production of the food, consistent with the current guidance relating to the ability to make these claims. In assessing compliance with the guidance, we consider the direct expenditures, in terms of the cost of production, including raw materials and labour, as well as the expenditure on the overheads that are incurred relating directly to the production of the food.