Again I want to be very clear that when we were talking about the $30 value, it was against the backdrop of the specific crisis of Abbotsford, where factors were taken into account to deal with those pressures. Subsequent to that, we tried to act in a responsive, flexible way. We were advised after the fact that in fact we had exceeded our authorities, and we were instructed, although not to do a pullback of moneys that had been allocated, to bring those values in line with our regulated authorities. Those discussions led to the values that were established last September.
While we recognize it does pose challenges to the industry, as was commented, we have worked with the department to look at secondary phasing of compensation that would address those factors beyond the authorities that we can administer ourselves. As has been pointed out, we've also tried to adjust the approach we take with producers to offset the full value of their costs, including those issues of disposal of materials to an extent that we probably hadn't exercised before. In the event of economic hardship, we are trying everything we can do within our authority to assist the producers and working in an integrated fashion with the department or other programming, with support then going forward in a sustainable way.