As you mentioned, the tobacco adjustment assistance program in its entirety wasn't enough. It was a step forward and it accomplished a little bit, but it wasn't the whole answer. It's going to take a far more comprehensive way forward, and it's going to take more than one party acting on it. It takes all of us working together. As Mr. Neukamm answered in the last question, the economic development piece isn't the only answer, and I'm here to agree that it isn't the only answer. There's far more needed, but we can't ignore any of these pieces; they all have to be there.
We're facing a single-industry situation in that area of southern Ontario—and you've had growers in Quebec facing this too, and I know there are others across Canada—with the industry shrinking to the point it is today, and there's no reason to think it's not going to go further. If we are to fix this, we have to have a comprehensive look at this with all oars in the water going in the same direction. The economic development situation is the same as that being faced by many single-industry towns in the forestry industry, or even now, in some cases, in manufacturing. This is where we find ourselves in the five counties in southern Ontario that have found tobacco to be their lifeblood, the economic driver of their area—but it's going away.
It's about the producers, but it's also about the guy in the barber shop, the guy at the car dealership, the guy who runs the local restaurant, and it's about the chambers of commerce, the mayors in these areas, and the municipalities, whose tax bases are shrinking. The good thing about the people in that part of southern Ontario is that they have a fantastic entrepreneurial spirit; they will come through, and they see a life.
The economic piece brought to that area by tobacco was all they used to have, and now the answer is that we need to be comprehensive in our solution. It's about all of that.