I don't want to belabour this point, but the fact of the matter is that in Mr. Measner's position, he's obligated, as CEO, to obey the wishes of the board of directors. The Government of Canada asked him to go against what the board of directors was telling him.
So if he abided by the law according to the Wheat Board Act and took his direction from the board, he would be fired. He accepted that, because the government was basically saying to him that he could keep his job if he basically broke the law and went against the wishes of the board.
Mr. Chair, this amendment is out of order because it changes the intent from holding the government to its responsibility and tries to dig into information that the parliamentary secretary already has available to him, since he has responsibilities for the Canadian Wheat Board.