No. What I would say is that I, for sure, want to express that I do not support COOL. Absolutely, I would like it to go away.
One of the things I wanted to point out is that I think we are not having the consequences to western Canada that were initially perceived. A lot of that, again, is just because of the cattle population being smaller and being more aggressive in the packing side. So it was more that. But no, absolutely, removing COOL is one of the key objectives we would support.
I'd like to touch on what Patrick said about the initial letter that Secretary Vilsack sent out. That would be the bad side of COOL. That would affect meat sales. It would create burdens in the packing industry in the United States. It would be very intense when you talk about segregation costs.
That enhanced COOL they've talked about would be really a bad thing. I'm saying we can work through our present form of COOL. Depending on where our cattle population settles out and where we are, you know, I firmly want to process all the cattle here, so then I think the U.S. packers should be irrelevant in this discussion.