I tend to agree with what Pierre has said. If we have a committee devoted to food safety, which brings up the past and goes into the future based on the tragedy that happened, we could probably get some really good results for Canadians out of this.
I personally don't see a problem with changing that, unless some of my other colleagues have some comments. It would give the committee a mandate to decide who to pull in for witnesses and where to start. It would be left up to them. On the surface it sounds like a very good way to go.