To speak to what Mr. Eyking just said, as long as common sense prevails and goals are met.... I don't think anybody in this committee wants to waste time doing an exploration of something that will go on and on. However, in the same breath, we want to get to the bottom of listeriosis and come up with some constructive recommendations that move our food safety forward. I think exploring listeriosis and what happened is part of the report on food safety. I think we're accomplishing that with the amendment that was just done.
I guess the question here is where it would be best to do this work. Is it in a subcommittee on its own, or is it actually here in this committee? Whose purview is this actually within? We've been arguing right now that it is within the purview of the agriculture department, so then should the agriculture committee not take this on? I'm just asking the question.