There seemed to be some resistance to change--just as long as we have some flexibility.
I don't know the length of it, but from all discussions it's fairly lengthy and it'll be a fairly comprehensive report. If there seems to be a big concern that the chair needs to be here, that's fine, as long as we have some flexibility at the end.
So we have November 19, the 24th, and then on November 26 it would seem we have another, similar discussion that we'll follow up on after November 17 on the program review.
And should there be something, Mr. Chair, in terms of finishing the conclusions, or I don't know what--all I'm asking is that there be flexibility on this thing. I think you talked about having ministry people come in, and they're fairly flexible in terms of being able to move ahead and work on it on November 26, just to get it done.
I'm hoping it doesn't. The food safety one, a pretty comprehensive report, went really well, except for the end. But in saying that, that's okay, we went through it well. I'm hoping this will too. It's just that if the concern is that the chair be here, as Mr. Eyking has said, that's fair--as long as we can have some flexibility around November 26, just in case. So I'm hoping this might be an option.