This is just one area where we're non-competitive in terms of policy, the SRM removal.
On the renderers' costs, Brian, I think you said the bills flow back to the packer. That's true. I agree with you. But then they take another step from there. They flow back to the primary producers. The primary producer picks up these costs. In terms of the renderers' costs that also get backed down, do you have any idea what those might be on an individual basis? If we're going to talk about competitiveness.... And I agree with you that we're competitive, but the problem is we're not competitive from a policy approach.
In what other areas do we need to be requesting assistance or better policy from the government?