In my opinion, the motion proposing that the Committee continue its business is not a dilatory motion because it does not talk about moving to another item on the agenda. However, if the motion stated that the witnesses should be heard now, that would relate to another item on the agenda. So, if the Committee continues its discussions on the same topic, it is an ordinary motion and not a dilatory motion, in my view.
On November 17th, 2009. See this statement in context.