Pierre, it would be perhaps better if you could withdraw the motion. Let's take the schedule Alex has set out here, juggle it around, and then move it as a motion at the end. We'd accomplish more that way, Mr. Chair, if I could say so.
My own view on what Alex has here is that I really do believe we need to move the cattle industry up. I'm sure the Canadian Cattlemen's Association could be here by Thursday. I know they have great concerns. I don't know whether we can invite witnesses from the U.S. embassy or not, but we should have an explanation from the United States' side on what they're doing with COOL and tell them that, as a parliamentary committee, we're damned well not pleased.
I would suggest moving the cattle industry and COOL up together a little further and then preparing witnesses for program review.
The other point I would suggest—and I agree with what André said earlier on product of Canada labelling—is that I would like to see it up the list considerably. I am getting a lot of calls in my riding from people who produce a product of Canada but do not now meet the identity criteria because the Prime Minister went too far with the 98%. The Prime Minister overruled what this committee recommended, and now we have another problem. So we have to sort this out for those who are actually providing a product of Canada but can't call it such—they have boxes made and so on.
So I'd move it up.