For Adam's generation, crop insurance and some of the programs the government has--those are well run and well needed. Don't change a lot of what's there now. Maybe they could use some fine-tuning, but....
Our opinion is that if we're probably stupid enough to spend $600 or $700 an acre to plant a crop to make $25 or $30 an acre, I think we'd better insure it. I don't think the bank is going to really think you're too bright to start with.
I'm not sure the next generation will have the luck we've had. Inflation has really taken care of us, and some people have commented on that already. It isn't that we've made 20% return on our investment; inflation has helped us considerably. That really doesn't matter until you go to sell, but the last two or three generations of farmers have had it pretty good that way.
On what to do to fix agriculture, as I said, if we put ten farmers together, there are ten different opinions.
I talked to a guy this morning who is not in farming at all. I was getting a hydraulic hose fixed at a construction guy's place. He said, “You know, the problem is, you should call it a food subsidy, because that's really what it is--a worldwide food subsidy. It's not a grant; there are no grants to farmers.” And I thought, well, hey, here's a guy who has not a cent invested: good point.
Anything else, Adam?