As Réjean mentioned earlier, when it comes to agriculture, the investments that have to be made are significant. They are often made for a single use. If we invest on a building that lasts 15 years, we need 12 to 15 years to break even. However, the policy may change after five years, as we saw recently with certain products. When the rules are changed three, four or five years later—whether it is domestic or international rules—producers no longer have any leeway.
Perhaps we should begin by making policies last longer. That would be a first step. Then, if a major policy change is required, we should try to protect the assets of the farms that have already been in operation for three, four or five years. We could maybe engage in positive discrimination under the policies. While indicating that the policy is going to change, we could implement the changes over the next three, four, five or six years, so that the operation would have time to adjust. It would not suddenly find itself in a dead end.