Minister, what you are saying is that at the beginning of a year—for example, in last year's mains—the government looks ahead to the year. They basically peg a value of what they think business risk management programs may pay out. Of course there are a lot on unknowns in the year ahead. When they reach the following year, they assess the market that just occurred—whether the prices are good, whether we anticipate them being good in the future year—and then they adjust that budgeted amount.
It's somewhat of an unfair criticism, then, to say that there's a negative amount against BRM lines in the mains, and that farmers aren't getting what they should be getting. You're saying that if it's been a good year for farmers, they don't need that type of support from the government. In fact, it's actually a good-news story, and the mains are simply reflecting the good news. Would that be a good summary?