The word in the third line of new clause 2.1 is “including”. From my understanding of legislative interpretation, “including“ means “including without limitation”. What is prescribed in (a), (b), and (c) is not intended to limit in any way the purpose of the legislation and therefore wouldn't be in contradiction of any other parts of the legislation that might not actually be recited in (a), (b), and (c).
On November 6th, 2012. See this statement in context.