I'll answer you in English, so that I can be more precise.
That's entirely correct. These are fantastic innovations. They are based in science. They are moving very rapidly.
Generally speaking, people are always hesitant about new things that seem incomprehensible. In our case, we're talking about biologics and using biology to change structures of different things. I think the key to that is to ensure that our science and our regulatory system is as stringent and strong as possible. In this industry's case, I see it as a competitive advantage for our industry because Canada is world renowned for its regulatory capacity. It struggles sometimes to keep up with the pace of change, but it is well known around the world as one of the leading jurisdictions from a regulatory standpoint. If our regulations are based in science and are science-driven, then I think we stand a very good chance of changing minds. Over time, people will understand.
As an example, I know that the sun is bad for my skin. I know that if I put sunblock on my skin it protects me against the sun. Is it possible that in 10 years a study will come out that says sunblock causes a cancer of some sort? Absolutely. What I do know now is that it protects me from the sun. That's what the science tells us.
It's the same thing when you're talking about genetically modified foods or any other type of produce. Science tells us that it's absolutely safe. It's been consumed for hundreds if not thousands of years. When we're talking about food that is genetically modified, we're essentially doing a more surgical version of what we've done naturally over hundreds of years. If you look at corn from a thousand years ago, you'll see that it looks like a little grain of wheat. It does not look like the corn we have today, but over time, we were able to selectively breed and grow the kind of corn we have now. Now we're doing the selective breeding in a much more refined and specific way, which provides you with something more quickly, and it's based in science.