This question is for both Tom and Kara. From the strategic side of the equation, how much of what you do is proactive and how much is reactive?
Proactively, you're looking at markets, access, value added, and so on. Reactively you're looking at business risk management, what's working and what's not, as you develop the next policy framework.
What's the split between reactionary views and looking proactively to build agricultural capacity?