Sure.
I think it depends on which particular instance we're looking at. There are some great examples of where Canadian regulators have worked very well with their international counterparts around alignment. One example in the case of a trade agreement is NAFTA. We have a technical working group on pesticide regulation, for example. It's been one of the most successful examples in a trade agreement of solving non-tariff barriers by aligning our regulators. In that case, the Canadian regulator is meeting those standards that you describe.
When we look at other trade agreements, I think there's a real question in there, coming back to the earlier question about the Regulatory Cooperation Council, about how we can encourage that type of interaction between regulators in countries that are party to a trade agreement. What we've seen in the 20-plus years of NAFTA is that alignment has really prevented, to go back to Dan's comments, a lot of those trade barriers, because they've been interacting closely.