The example I've been given to understand the situation is that the EU approach would be the equivalent of refusing to use electricity because of the risk of shock. We all know that if appropriate safeguards are put in place, the risk of electrocution is minimal. Basically, it's an all or nothing. If there's a hazard, then we're not even going to go there, whereas Canada will say, well, there is a risk, so let's see what we can do to minimize it.
On June 6th, 2017. See this statement in context.