Fine.
Thank you for the question.
An example of this might relate to shelterbelts. Again, this was a topic with Naresh's presentation earlier.
From the point of view of the farmer, as David indicated, it's most convenient to get rid of them because of the large machinery, but in so doing, we're losing not only something that captures carbon but also something that provides habitat. If we can provide a mechanism to allow the farmer to effectively cultivate and manage that property and at the same time allow for.... For example, there might be margin shelterbelts and things like that. These are the sorts of things that collectively I think could help. We don't want there to be an expense for agriculture, but instead, while we're managing our landscapes, we can think about whether there are certain environmental opportunities.