Thank you very much, Mr. Chair, and welcome to the minister.
What I'm going to refer to is page 29 of CFIA's departmental plan for 2018-19. In that, there is a relationship that speaks to the actual expenditures of 2014-15, which is the last year of the Conservatives, and then it shows and goes through the planned expenditures and the planned full-time equivalents for the next three years and planned spending for the Liberals. In that, when we deal with the expenditure side, one out of 20 of the categories showed an increase. In 19 out of 20 there were less funds.
On the full-time equivalents, three times out of 20, there were increased full-time equivalents, and 17 times out of 20 there were fewer full-time equivalents. On April 16, 2018, when we discussed trade initiatives, I indicated that when you look at the budgets, it looks like in the next couple of years there will be a reduction to CFIA. We used to have around 3,200 full-time equivalents. In the projections, it's down to 2,600 to 2,800. There's always talk about having the manpower, having the money, but we can see that it's coming out of CFIA. The answer from Mr. Fred Gorrell was:
That's a good question. For the agency, definitely, how we prioritize and where we put out money is important as well. Money sunsets and comes and goes. We have enough assets right now to do our job, and I think we are able to do it well.
Yet we hear—and Mr. MacGregor spoke about this—discussions about how we recover from all of the money that was lost out of the CFIA. We constantly hear from you and the Liberals about how we recover from all of that, so this is what we are talking about. This is where the numbers are coming from. I'd be happy to speak with the officials as they would be able to give us more detail in the next hour.
The next point that I wanted to make has to do with the carbon tax. My specific question is this: how much reduction of greenhouse gas emissions will the carbon tax result in as far as our agriculture industry is concerned?