I would add to this that members around the CAFTA table put forward a number of objectives for the NAFTA renegotiation. We're very happy that the agreement is now going through, but there were a number of things we saw that could be improved that weren't achieved. The regulatory co-operation among Canada, the U.S. and Mexico is a way to help do that, through the committee on agriculture, the consultative committees on agriculture and other forums.
I'll give you examples. The feed that our animals consume is regulated in Canada and in the U.S. It's regulated by very specific definitions, but those regulations are not the same. That can create barriers for a number of things. Food safety is also not regulated the same. Crop protection products were mentioned earlier; they're not regulated the same. When you look at phytosanitary measures required for all of our agricultural products, they're not the same across the three countries. All of these issues can result in small differences, which create trade barriers and costs, or in some cases can create an inability to trade or use technology.
Each sector would have examples. The beef and pork sectors, for example, have had concerns when it comes to inspections of their products, around the thickness of the border and the costs imposed when meat products are exported from Canada to the United States.
Further, for vegetable oil products, we talked about margarine now having access, but shortening is a much larger opportunity where we don't have tariff-free access. It wasn't addressed in these negotiations. A number of these regulatory issues, rules of origin issues and technical issues remain and have an opportunity to be addressed.