There are two things I would point to. They're both regulatory programs. It is to provide the predictability and the confidence for processors to invest in the Canadian marketplace to grow our processing side.
The first would be, as I mentioned in the brief, regulations around plant-breeding innovation, particularly gene editing. There's new innovation in plant breeding that can unlock so much potential in the crop. It could lead to better environmental outcomes or better health profiles for the product itself. It's all in the seed and the development of the seed that you provide to the farmer to grow. You can make a big difference, and we have, historically, done some amazing things. Canola is all about innovation and science innovation, so making sure there is clarity to the regulatory practices in Canada to facilitate innovation in seed development is number one.
The second would be similarly with the Pest Management Regulatory Agency and making sure that we make science-based decisions there—not decisions based on people's concerns about possible safety but on the real science profiles. Our farmers need to have access to really good products in order to do weed control and manage their crop in a competitive way. We need to absolutely make sure that we have science-based decisions with respect to our crop protection products.